
Jennifer Dixon
Architect says it lost ‘hundreds of thousands’, which left it unable to pay staff
Austin-Smith Lord this week admitted the losses to its business are “huge”, following weeks of unrest caused by non-payment from its Abu Dhabi client.
Last Friday the 62-year-old practice entered into a company voluntary agreement (CVA), which will see it trade under a business plan agreed with creditors including Arup, Buro Four and its own redundant staff.
Jennifer Dixon, a partner at Austin-Smith Lord’s London office, told BD: “We could demonstrate a viable underlying plan, and the creditors will benefit much more from us being around to collect the debts.”
She added: “But the losses to the business are high — in their hundreds of thousands. Most of the money earned by the partners was tied up in working capital and most of that is gone now.”
Austin-Smith Lord was forced to enter into the CVA after it emerged last month that its Abu Dhabi client, the Abu Dhabi Authority for Culture & Heritage, owed it more than £11.3 million. The practice was working on a cultural quarter in the city centre.
It has been agreed that the creditors will be paid 85 p for every £1 they are owed. Meanwhile, Austin-Smith Lord will continue to run four “lean practices”, and in the coming weeks will consolidate its North-west offices into one.
Dixon said: “The fallout of what’s happened is inevitably tough and what kind of practice it will turn out to be, I don’t know. The collateral damage in that respect has been immense.”
Dixon revealed that the practice had not been paid for work on the centre since the start of 2011 . “Payment delays crept in and by June it was clear that if we didn’t get [money] flowing then it would be very serious,” she said.
It has caused a lot of stress. There have been a lot of tears — it’s been harrowing
Jennifer Dixon
But she admitted it was the firm’s unpaid staff who were “the real losers”, saying: “They were left with unpaid salaries, which we’re struggling to pay. It has caused a lot of stress. There’ve been a lot of tears — it’s been harrowing.
“The toughest thing to deal with by far has been the angry staff. I’ll see when we’re in clear water if I can reconcile the way some people have behaved.”
Meanwhile, partners at the firm said talks with a potential buyer were ongoing. “There are a range of opportunities on the table: taking the practice in whole, or just our work abroad,” said partner Neil Chapman. “We need to see what’s best going to suit both parties.”
30 April 2013
29 January 2013
15 December 2011
14 December 2011
9 December 2011
6 December 2011
2 December 2011
Sign in to make a comment on this story.
Sign In
Readers' comments (2)
Sorry but the principals should never let it get so bad that staff are not paid as they are the one who get no warning of this and end up suffering most. Why do so many practices do work for free basically for clients? How will this help getting paid in the end or getting respect?
How insensitive is she.
To quote: The toughest thing to deal with by far has been the angry staff. I’ll see when we’re in clear water if I can reconcile the way some people have behaved.
I assume you are talking about the angry staff and how they behaved. Well, I know many of them, they work very hard and very long hours with no rewards. If they were angry, they were justifiably angry. Maybe the management should take a long look at themselves and how they behaved. Why did you not see this coming? They guys at the bottom do the hard work and the people at the top take the rewards. Jenifer, you should be ashamed of yourself.
It also sounds like the partners are trying to get out now and sell up with as much as they can get.