
Chapman Taylor's proposal for Liverpool Waters
Heritage watchdog latest to voice concern over impact of Chapman Taylor plans
Chapman Taylor’s plans for Liverpool Waters would cause “serious harm” and compromise the city’s world heritage status, English Heritage has warned.
In a strongly worded letter to Liverpool City Council, the heritage watchdog criticised the scale of the development and called for a planning decision to be referred to government ministers.
English Heritage’s intervention marks the latest in a series of blows to developer Peel Holding’s scheme, which has been the subject of criticism by Design Council Cabe and Unesco in recent weeks.
Plans for a cluster of tall buildings at Clarence Dock are singled out for particular criticism by English Heritage, which warns that it will “overwhelm the historic, horizontal character of the docklands”.
The letter goes on to say that the density, mass and scale of the development “will compromise and unbalance the historic urban landscape of Liverpool as a whole”.
“We believe the impact of these proposals on the historic character of Liverpool as a whole…and on the significance and setting of many designated heritage assets is very serious,” wrote English Heritage’s North West planning director Henry Owen-John.
While Owen-John conceded that there are some positive benefits to the proposals, he concluded: “We believe that the harm is so serious and the value of the heritage so significant that national government should consider whether the matter should be called in for its own determination.”
4 March 2013
2 January 2013
9 March 2012
6 March 2012
24 January 2012
8 November 2011
22 July 2011
22 July 2011
Sign in to make a comment on this story.
Sign In
Readers' comments (6)
I like the young couple embraced while looking at the new apartments(?) "Sniff... It's just so beautiful, Wayne"
Why are "government ministers" any better placed to decide?
David
If the decision is referred to ministers it will be considered by officials at CLG. English Heritage's view is that the proposed scheme, and its potential impact, is of national significance so should be decided at that level of governance.
Poor old Liverpool.
Why do cities always want to aspire to be souless Manhattan-esque mazes?
@alex
Partly because developers want to get maximum profit from the land..(?)