
Ruth Reed. president of the RIBA
RIBA president Ruth Reed has refused to deny reports that she made a failed bid to oust chief executive Harry Rich at a board meeting earlier this year.
In an email sent to RIBA members, and seen by BD, Reed did not allude to the exact nature of events – believed to be an attempted vote of no confidence in Rich which allegedly took place on February 17.
She said: “Contrary to the speculation in those reports I want to reassure you that the RIBA Board continues to work with the executive to implement, on your behalf, the policies and new ways of working that council has agreed upon and which will help the RIBA to deliver effectively against its mission and business plan.”
Last week, the RIBA told board members to stay silent over reports of the rift between the president and chief executive, which has caused concern among members.
“I assumed they were working hand in hand,” said one. “But that is obviously not the case.”
“Hopefully this will all be sorted out by the time [next RIBA president] Angela Brady starts,” said another.
RIBA president Ruth Reed’s email to members in full:
“You may have read recent reports about the RIBA Board in the trade press.
Contrary to the speculation in those reports I want you to reassure you that the RIBA Board continues to work with the executive to implement, on your behalf, the policies and new ways of working that council has agreed upon and which will help the RIBA to deliver effectively against its mission and business plan.
I very much regret the misrepresentation contained in the article and the inaccurate perceptions of the Institute that it may provoke, albeit amongst a small number of readers.”
9 May 2011
19 April 2011
1 April 2011
31 March 2011
Sign in to make a comment on this story.
Sign In
Readers' comments (1)
ALl this internecine waffle is mere distraction from their inability to prioritise real issues affecting the profession.
There is only one real question for the RIBA to be considering at the moment.
Is there any downside for architecture in seeking to regulate the provision of services to architects?
If there isn't, why aren't they championing this?