
Prince Charles at the RIBA Annual Lecture in 2009.
Source: Robert Leslie/RIBAThe Prince of Wales’ architectural charity is weighing up a plan to fill the gap left by Cabe by carrying out design reviews.
Prince’s Foundation chief executive Hank Dittmar told BD it would decide by Christmas whether to go ahead with the move.
“We’d have to talk to our network and assess the market,” he added. “”It would need to pay for itself but we wouldn’t be doing it to make money.”
He said its design review panels would have to reflect all style opinions to fend off accusations that only traditional architecture would get the thumbs-up.
Dittmar added: “To be credible, it would have to have democratic, independent judgement. We would have to have a panel that was balanced and not exclusively traditional architects.”
News the charity is eyeing a role in design review was immediately branded “an absolute disaster” by former Stirling Prize winner Will Alsop.
“The Prince’s Foundation has a definite architectural agenda,” Alsop said. “We know what it is. The Prince is not impartial at all, he would get involved and his meddling would increase.”
But Robert Adam, who sat on the Cabe design review panel for six years, said it was about time other styles were represented by design reviews.
“I was on it to provide balance but in the end [Cabe] became a huge bureaucracy where the balance had been lost and ended up peddling the established architectural view.”
The government is still speaking to Cabe about the prospects for salvaging parts of its function. The majority of Cabe’s 125 staff have now been given their redundancy notices ahead of the body’s closure next March but architecture minister John Penrose said: “We are still in discussions with Cabe about its future.”
It has emerged just a handful of bodies, including the RIBA, the Sorrell Foundation and Kevin McCloud’s development firm HAB, lobbied Penrose to spare Cabe.
RIBA director of public affairs Anna Scott-Marshall said it was also looking at ways to fund future design reviews. “We need to find ways of funding the work so we are exploring options with others about what happens next.”
12 January 2011
9 November 2010
4 November 2010
29 October 2010
25 October 2010
22 October 2010
22 October 2010
Sign in to make a comment on this story.
Sign In
Readers' comments (29)
Can't we just put the Prince and Will Alsop in a room together, tell them it's the Cabe Design Review Panel, and lock the door?
Depressing. It's going to be like a totalitarian regime but without the convenience of the dictator actually being the client.
This move would a disaster for british architecture and the architectural community. Architects and the RIBA need to revolt and not allow this to happen.
The World has most definitely gone mad......whatever next?!!
Well if ever there was a potent symbol of transparency and democracy, it is he.
Sharpen the guillotine! Vive la Republique!
This could potentially force HRH to see different points of view and engage him in a democratic process...could....
Is it the 1st of April today?
The Prince's personal foundation now wants the authority to enforce bad (pastiche) architecture upon us?? That doesn't seem quite in the spirit of what CABE was supposed to be doing... what is it that we're paying the royal family to do again?
Will Alsop is not best placed to comment on these matters. In October 2008 a proposed development in Putney, designed by him, was so hated by the local community that it was stopped in its tracks and booed off the agenda by a packed, unanimous protest meeting.
Maritz Vandenberg